Carol Felsenthal
On politics

Obama/Boehner Jobs Speech Mess: The Buck Stops with Bill Daley

When Bill Daley took over Rahm Emanuel’s job as President Obama’s chief of staff, the conventional wisdom had it that, finally, an adult was in the room. It may be too soon to judge Daley’s performance in the job, but he certainly earns a low grade for the dustup over the scheduling of Obama’s upcoming jobs speech…

When Bill Daley took over Rahm Emanuel’s job as President Obama’s chief of staff, the conventional wisdom had it that, finally, an adult was in the room. (Remember, it was not long ago that our new and impressively disciplined mayor, the profane and excitable Rahm, was seen—maturity-wise—as a boy.)

It may be too soon to judge Daley’s performance in the job, but he certainly earns a low grade for the dust-up over the scheduling of Obama’s upcoming jobs speech.

On Wednesday morning, Bill Daley called House Speaker John Boehner [R-Ohio] to tell him that the president wanted to deliver his speech before a joint session of Congress next Wednesday night. Approximately 90 minutes later, the president’s aides tweeted the announcement of the speech. A few hours later, Boehner said “nothing doing,” claiming that he had heard Daley but not agreed. Boehner proposed that the speech be given the next night instead, and, by Wednesday evening, Obama had agreed. Some in the president’s own party used a different word: capitulated.

So Obama gets stuck with next Thursday, the night of the NFL season opener, featuring the Super Bowl-winning Green Bay Packers and the New Orleans Saints. The decision to stick Obama’s speech in at 6 p.m. central—kickoff is at 7:30 p.m.—means that, in many parts of the country, the speech won’t even air in prime time. How many Chicago voters are sitting in their easy chairs clutching their remotes at 6 p.m.—especially during this busy back-to-school season?

If Daley didn’t know that Wednesday, the day Congress returns from its five-week break, was also the night of the NBC/Poliltico-sponsored GOP debate at the Reagan Presidential Library in Simi Valley, California—moderated by NBC’s Brian Williams, and featuring, for the first time, Texas Gov. Rick Perry—he should have. Yes, it’s one debate of 20 to come, but the contretemps made the president look like he was mischievously, sneakily trying to steal his potential opponents’ thunder.

In an editorial entitled “Oh, Grow Up,” critical mostly of Boehner and Company, this paragraph stood out: “It’s possible that the White House failed to seek Mr. Boehner’s back-room agreement before making its formal request. That’s hard to believe, even from an administration that is maladroit politically, to put it kindly.” The Hill’s Sam Youngman made essentially the same point in his report: “The back-and-forth has left some Democrats in Washington worried that the White House is becoming a rudderless ship.”

Daley, the ship’s skipper, has made no public comment so far.

It’s true that this story only may interest political junkies and pundits—and that it’s the quintessential silly Washington dead-days-of-August special—but the conflict had legs into September. It seems to dash hopes that the White House and the Congress would stop snipping and start legislating. It supports and strengthens Standard and Poor’s argument that it lowered its rating of the country’s credit because relations between the executive and legislative branches are dysfunctional and deadlocked. And this morning’s news that the nation had added zero jobs in August only adds to the story’s relevance.

The president, who could have given the speech from the Oval Office or the East Room, wanted to deliver it from the grand chamber of the House of Representatives to highlight its gravity and to assure coverage by network TV. Whether it’s true that Boehner and his caucus are trying to put every obstacle in Obama’s way—historians say that this is the first time in the nation’s history that a president has been denied the opportunity to address a joint session on the date of his choice—the loser is the president, who once again comes off looking like the 90-pound weakling getting sand kicked in his face.

Share

comments
3 years ago
Posted by pol&pers

Bad staff work was apparent from the start of this fiasco. The first thing you do is check the calendar, not only of your friends, but of your opponents before making a date certain. Using Twitter a short while later was jumping the gun when you know the GOP seeks to embarrass the president at every turn. I would not have suggested a Congressional speech this week. Thursday's time is bad. Boehner looks uncooperative but Obama looks flummoxed again.

3 years ago
Posted by soccer

I was reading the label on a can of Goya Chickpeas the other day and I saw a profound statement to cover this little contretemps "this product may contain nuts".

3 years ago
Posted by SKEPTICAL

The President needs to make a number of changes in his staff. He has enough problems without having to be plagued with the lack of staff focus that this reflects. As to Boehner, this sort of display of disrespect for the Presidency asnd for the electorate plays better to his base than to the country as a whole and will not help his party in the upcoming general election.

3 years ago
Posted by one

Yeah,, yeah.. Blame Bill Daley.

Just how can you expect him to be on top of this stuff,, manning the helm,,,while he's trying to sneak bill HR 4646 through under our noses?

You know,, the one where every bank transaction we do,,the bank gets a 1% handling fee,,,or,,,TAX !!??

Either way,, Bill's too busy helping his self and his bank pals to pay attention to mundane scheduling conflicts.

3 years ago
Posted by notwhet

This article makes total sense.
Obama just has a bad staff -- Daley, and bad followers -- the American people.
If it wasn't for those 2 things he could replicate all the documented success he had when living in Hyde Park.
Great article!!!!!!!!!

3 years ago
Posted by still here

Maybe Obama's speech should be moved to prime time on thursday, and the kickoff for the football game should be delayed. Anyone who complains aboutthese priorities can be referred to the Speaker of the House to complain.

3 years ago
Posted by carol f

Yesterday's Washington Post has an interesting analysis of the President's controversial and infuriating [to environmentalists and progressives] decision "to suspend new anti-smog standards."

Did Bill Daley play a role in that?: looks like the answer is yes.

Reporters Juliet Eilperin and Peter Wallsten write that Bill Daley was in frequent contact with the head lobbyist for the Chamber of Commerce, one of many industry=related groups that is applauding the administration's decision.

Some key lines from the story:

“I do not have a sense of the administration’s philosophy here or where or how they determine to draw a line between economic impacts versus outside organizational pressures,” said R. Bruce Josten, the top lobbyist for the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, which represents the nation’s businesses.

The Chamber heaped praise on the White House for its ozone decision. But Josten, who said he is in frequent contact with White House Chief of Staff William Daley and other top officials, said the administration “still has a heavy hand” with hundreds of regulations in the pipeline, from those affecting the environment to labor and capital markets.

....

For weeks, the Obama administration had struggled with how to split the difference on the smog rule, which had both enormous economic and public-health implications. At a closed meeting with environmentalists in mid-July, Daley wondered aloud why the two sides couldn’t reach the sort of agreement the White House recently brokered on fuel efficiency for cars and light trucks.

The story in full is well worth a read:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/obamas-decision-on-smog-rule-offers-hints-on-environmental-strategy/2011/09/03/gIQAX4EzzJ_print.html

Submit your comment